Literature Review Assignment Help

Literature Review Assignment Help, If you are asked to write a theoretical literature review, your work will have to be based on the information found in printed/online sources. A theoretical literature review is written to assert the writer’s understanding of the topic they are writing about. It implies an unbiased attitude, lack of bias, and critical stance of the writer.

Thus  HomeworkMarket theoretical literature review aims to present your vision of the topic you are writing about. You can give your point of view as an expert in a particular domain or focus on other researchers’ main ideas. A narrow topic requires a short scholarly review; an extensive case should include five relevant sources. Generally speaking, a theoretical literature review is the best place to start any scientific paper covering a particular domain, be it engineering, biology, or computer science.

The second part of the research involves an empirical literature review. Again, it is necessary to provide knowledge about what has been done in this field. For each topic you choose, for example, the theory of education, you need to find authors that wrote about the subject in question in their works. Here are a few examples of what empirical research papers look like.

Most of the time, literature review takes place at the very beginning of any research work. Typically, the literature review chapter includes the following sections, which differ depending on the type of study. Also, each unit requires specific information. You can find clear instructions on writing each chapter in your instructions or on the web (e.g., see APA/MLA/Turabian Documentation – Writing and Formatting Scholarly Papers).

How Do You Write A Theoretical Literature Review?

In the first part of your theoretical paper, you need to summarize the research question, state what points you want to prove, and the purpose of your writing. It should be your first paragraph. In the second paragraph, you need to define terms. This means that you should clarify definitions of words and identify the meaning of critical concepts you will use later in your theoretical paper.

This can be a difficult step for many students. It is essential not only to define but also to explain the word or concept. This is because you will be using these words and concepts several times in your paper. The more you explain these words, the better it is for your writing.

The third paragraph should catch a reader’s attention by presenting an overview of previous studies and hypotheses made. Then, you need to explain how this study differs from previous ones and what makes your theory unique. The fourth paragraph is all about describing the research method and the sample you chose. First, you will have to lay out your process clearly and explain why you chose it, that is, convenience sampling or randomization. Then, it would help if you concluded with the most crucial part: results and conclusions.

In your fifth paragraph, you need to summarize the results using vivid language and be as straightforward as possible. In other words, your readers shouldn’t be confused or left with any questions. Finally, before you finish this paragraph, you need to restate your thesis statement (the main point of your paper) for the last time so that there is no question about what you’re trying to say (i.e., it should be stated in one sentence).

The seventh paragraph of the literature review format should summarize the essential points you have made in the previous sections. Here, in a theoretical literature review, you should:

• Clarify and link back to earlier points that have been made;
• Lead into and prepare the reader for the final section;
• Transparently summarize the main points;
• Report on any unexpected findings.

You should also provide all of the information needed for someone to understand your work that will allow you to completing your literature review.

What are the three parts of the literature review?

A literature review is a form of academic writing that summarizes existing research or reviews on a particular topic. This piece by GISHOMEWORK.COM aims to identify, describe, and analyze the main issues in your field of study. A literature review typically contains three parts: An overview of your area’s current body of knowledge. The identification and analysis of gaps in the knowledge. A series of hypotheses for those gaps.

The Overview

The first part of a literature review is usually an overview. Often, you will be asked to provide a concise summary of the current state of knowledge on your research topic. For example, if you were writing a paper on organic farming methods, you might say: “Literature on organic farming has developed considerably in recent years. There are currently more than 422 studies that examine different aspects and techniques of organic farming.”

The second part after the overview is Problem. In this part, you should briefly introduce the problem, issue, or gap in the existing literature that needs to be filled in the theoretical literature review. Then, define the Problem and also explain why it is essential. What is the history of the Problem? What is meant by it? What do people or researchers mean by a particular term? What is your opinion about the Problem? What is the status of the Problem now? What do some people believe about it? Why is that so and so? Then, explain your view in an organized manner using proper evidence and reasoning.

The third part after the Problem is the Discussion. This section is your opportunity to provide your opinion on the importance of the problem, why it should be solved, and who needs it most. This section aims not only to explain why you are doing your topic but also to let the readers know what can be done about it. Here, you also need to point out gaps in the existing literature (if any) and how they can be filled. In addition, this section also lets you discuss the main findings, which will create a sense of sureness in the readers that what you have said earlier is correct.

What are the four significant types of literature reviews?

The four major types of literature reviews are systematic, descriptive, critical, and narrative.

Narrative

A narrative literature review describes a story told through the results of research studies. Typically, a narrative literature review can be found at the beginning of a research study report. It does not contain much-structured information but gives a general idea of the topics discussed in the rest of the study report.

Systematic

A systematic literature review will begin with creating the topic and research questions, followed by a review of the search terms used to search for relevant research. An examination of databases is then performed to locate the required research studies, which are then critically evaluated using several criteria set by the researcher to determine the soundness of this evidence. The results are then organized and presented in a format that demonstrates the validity and usefulness of the review’s findings.

Descriptive

Descriptive literature reviews are perhaps the most commonly used type of literature review. Descriptive literature reviews describe the patterns and trends in a given area of research. These are sometimes referred to as empirical reviews. A statistician is likely to be the one doing the work for a descriptive literature review. Scientific literature, although important, is not the only type of literature that a descriptive study examines.

Critical

Critical literature reviews in theoretical literature review examine what is missing from knowledge in a particular field. They are often written by people interested in a specific field but don’t want to do any primary research. They tend to focus more on research gaps than the performance of past research. They also give information about how other researchers have attempted to address that gap. Implicit in the critical review is usually an argument for how that gap should be addressed.

Theoretical

This kind of review is limited to describing and explaining the main thoughts and concepts on the subject in question. It also discusses the conceptual linkages between the subject and other related subjects. Psychology researchers aren’t interested in performing or reading literature reviews for fun (that would be weird). Instead, a theoretical review helps them understand a subject’s conceptual framework and how all the different aspects of it are related.

This kind of literature review that is presented by  Homeworkmarket is an overview of a subject that aims to conceptualize its components. For a theoretical literature review, the researcher doesn’t need to read through all the literature because he doesn’t need to know what has been said but what has been thought by others who have been working on the subject.

What is a theoretical framework example?

Examples of theoretical frameworks can be found in almost any field of study. Theoretical frameworks are helpful in theoretical literature reviews because they help researchers organize data and develop research questions appropriate for the available information. They also provide an organized structure for collecting new data and analyzing that data. For example, in psychology, theories are used to explain why human beings behave in the ways that they do. One example is the biopsychosocial model.

This theoretical framework brings together psychological, biological, and sociological factors affecting human behaviour. The biopsychosocial model is helpful because it allows researchers to understand the interactions between three primary systems, each of which affects behaviour independently and is critical to human life.

Another example is the idea that all humans have feelings, thoughts, and emotions, leading to the notion that humans are all capable of reasoning. Based on these ideas, people can understand how humans interact with one another and form predictions based on this information. In this case, we would expect humans to behave in similar ways given similar circumstances. A theoretical framework is not a theory in the strictest sense of the term. It’s more like a set of guiding principles that aid in interpreting a body of data while at the same time giving meaning to specific events or phenomena.

What is the difference between a theoretical review and a theoretical framework?

A theoretical review and a theoretical framework are both methods of analysis that can be used to frame the research that you conduct. A theoretical review is generally a literature review. A theoretical review aims to ensure that you are looking at the most relevant research in your field.

The theoretical framework is a map of the information and research found on the topic of study or a topic you are writing a review about. The theoretical framework gives shape to everything when it comes to writing a theoretical literature review academic review. It provides the writer with an outline on how to proceed and what information needs to be included in the study. It is the most essential aspect of writing theory because it clarifies how different approaches interrelate and what should be included in your analysis.

The theoretical framework is essential in theoretical literature review for any written work because it gives you guidelines on how to think about a specific topic. The theoretical framework guides the writer on how they will structure their theoretical literature review paper. The theoretical review and theoretical framework are two approaches to literary interpretation that are often confused; the two aren’t that dissimilar, but they approach the literature differently. On top of this, they differ in their usefulness.